|
[Back to projects]
Dynamic Door Displays
Using Office Doors as an Information Medium
David Nguyen, Joe Tullio, Tom Drewes, Elizabeth Mynatt
Traditionally, office doors have been used as display
surfaces for communicating a variety of information between door owners and
visitors. While flexible, doors
also burden their owners with the task of maintenance and do not support notions
of public and private information.Dynamic Door
Displays are tools for enhancing an office
door’s display capabilities to include automatic updates and tailored displays
of private information for particular visitors.
This project arose from an initial curiosity into the
function of information that is tied to the context of a specific location [3].
In many office
settings, it is common practice to post information on doors in the form of
documents and pictures. This
information may serve to answer some frequently asked questions when the owner
is away, or it may simply provide an expression of the owner’s interests or
personality. Postings may contain
anything from a favorite comic strip to a weekly calendar.
These may be intended for permanent display, or may be posted for only a
few minutes.
Shorter-term
messages are frequently used to indicate future availability (“back in 5
minutes”) or current location (“at lunch”).
Although the practice of posting on doors is effective,
problems arise. Since it is
typically the owner’s responsibility to maintain the door’s information,
postings can quickly go out of date when the owner is too busy or forgetful.
In addition, the public nature of the door’s surface causes owners to
withhold private information that may be useful to a select individual or group.
Design of Dynamic Door Displays
Our door displays automatically update
displays of dynamic information.
In addition to the owner’s current location [4], his/her
calendar information is updated.The
displays also provide access to private information by allowing visitors to
identify themselves through the
Dallas Semiconductor iButton system. They only occupy a
small portion of the door, allowing users to continue using paper-based postings
as well. Finally, information is
displayed in differing levels of detail depending on the owner’s privacy
requirements with respect to the visiting group or individual.
As with the
paper-based postings currently used on office doors, available information is
constrained to have some relevance to the door’s owner, and it is kept short
enough to be comprehended at a brief glance.
The display on our lab door initially shows a welcome
message and a list of current lab residents with available information:

Selecting a student allows access to his/her calendar and last known
location. Visitors may also leave a
voice message or select from a list of short text messages.
Our first prototypes used a 40x4 character LCD and four pushbuttons
connected to a PC via serial interface (Figure 1a). Since the LCD lacks the
graphical richness needed to properly display the variety of information that
can be posted on doors, we now use a color display from a Hewlett-Packard 620LX
handheld computer (Figure 1b).The
touch-sensitivity of the color display eliminates the need for the original
pushbuttons. A Proxim wireless LAN connects the display to the lab network.
|

|

|
|
Figure 1(a):
Original prototype with LCD screen.
|
Figure 1(b):
Later prototype with touchscreen.
|
To permit automatic updates to calendar and location
information, we use the Context Toolkit
[2], a suite of reusable widgets capable
of continually monitoring incoming data sensed from the outside world.
A widget for each user’s calendar and location is periodically queried
by the door display to keep the information current.
Future Work
Initial response to the door displays has been positive,
and we are currently in the process of building several more prototypes to
accommodate a demand for them. We
are excited to see how new users express themselves through their own custom
screens and applications. A web-access
version of the interface may offer convenience to remote visitors, but with the
understanding that different privacy considerations apply for web access than
for “face-to-door” access.
We are also considering the possibility of using audio cues
to convey messages from the door owner to identified visitors.
Using audio in conjunction with implicit identification would enable a
lightweight dialog between door and visitor; akin to the passing glance we
typically give a colleague’s door. To
this end, we are investigating the use of RF tags and speaker identification.
Since the door displays are tied to a particular location,
it is possible to develop applications that take advantage of this property.
For instance, a simple “you are here” display could assist in
orienting visitors from any door in our building.
Finally, we are interested in inferring the door owner’s
availability by using implicit sensing and probabilistic inference.
In this way, visitors could be notified of availability without
disturbing the office occupants.
This research was funded in part by NSF and Microsoft.
References
1.
Mankoff, J. and Schilit, B.Supporting
Knowledge Workers Beyond the Desktop with PalPlates, in Proceedings of CHI’97
(Atlanta GA, March 1997), ACM Press, 550-551.
2. Nguyen, D.H., Tullio, J., Drewes,
T. and Mynatt, E.D. Dynamic Door Displays. GVU Technical Report
#GIT-GVU-00-30, 2000. [PDF]
3.
Salber, D., Dey, A., and Abowd, G.
The Context Toolkit: Aiding the Development of
Context-Enabled Applications, in Proceedings
of CHI’99 (Pittsburgh PA, May 1999), ACM Press, 434-441.
4.
Spohrer, J.C.Information in
Places.IBM Systems Journal 38, 4 (1999).
5.
Weatherall, N. and Hopper, A. Predator: A Distributed Location Service
and Example Applications, in Proceedings
of CoBuild’99 (Pittsburgh PA, October 1999), Springer, 127-139.
|